Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park City results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,645 hits . Analysis detected 14,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,704 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Park City is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Park City
Keyword details
Total words: 15,704
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst