Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cottonwood Heights results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,894 of 37,536 keywords). This Cottonwood Heights is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Cottonwood Heights
Keyword details
Total words: 1,614
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst