Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Hill results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 191 hits . Analysis detected 1,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,233 of 6,162 authors). This Jim Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Jim Hill
Author details
Total words: 1,584
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst