Topic summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Administration results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,340 hits . Analysis detected 18,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,643 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,518 of 16,446 topics). This Election Administration is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Election Administration
Topic details
Total words: 18,643
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst