Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teo Popescu results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 3,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,160 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (4,018 of 6,348 authors). This Teo Popescu is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Teo Popescu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠37%Teo Popescu (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,160
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos