Topic summary
⁠59%4 analyzed articles/videos1,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Data results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,211 hits. Analysis detected 8,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,138 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,368 of 16,142 topics). This Economic Data is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Economic Data
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,138
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos