Topic summary
7% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ecology results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 1,712 hits . Analysis detected 18,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,572 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,163 of 16,495 topics). This Ecology is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Ecology
Topic details
Total words: 37,572
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles37.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst