Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ryan results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 4,715 hits . Analysis detected 40,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,544 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,184 of 6,134 authors). This John Ryan is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. John Ryan
Author details
Total words: 48,544
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles48.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst