KUOW73%

Washington paper mills mum about chemical safety after Longview disaster 17%

By Kim Malcolm38% John Ryan0%

6/11/2026, 12:43:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (16,986 of 20,368 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the article peer group.

It's been two weeks since Washington's worst industrial accident in nearly a century. 
More than a half-million gallons of a caustic liquid known as white liquor flooded through the Nippon Dynawave pulp mill in Longview after a storage tank imploded. 
Eleven people were killed. 
As the investigations continue, KUOW's environment reporter John Ryan has been looking into chemical safety at other Washington pulp mills. 
This interview has been edited for clarity. 
Kim Malcolm: You found three other paper mills in Washington that use the same white liquor chemical stew that killed workers at the Nippon Dynawave mill. 
Tell us about them. 
John Ryan: There are two other mills in Longview. 
There's the Smurfit Westrock mill and the North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC) mill. 
Then there's one in Port Townsend called the Port Townsend Paper Company mill. 
I asked each mill how much white liquor they have, how they store it, and what, if any, safety measures they've taken in the wake of the Nippon Dynawave disaster. 
The Smurfit Westrock mill in Longview declined to comment. 
The NORPAC and the Port Townsend mills didn't reply to my requests at all. 
How concerned should people living near these mills be about the chemicals there? 
The main risk is to workers inside these plants. 
Even this Nippon Dynawave disaster, the worst in nearly a century, had minimal, I would say, environmental impacts beyond the boundaries of the plant. 
There were some fish killed in a ditch outside the Longview plant, but the vast majority of those fish killed were actually introduced or invasive species, so, kind of a small environmental benefit, if you will. 
But it is hard to say how much of a risk these above-ground tanks of white liquor pose because there's little information about them. 
They're not very tightly regulated, unlike underground tanks and unlike containers of other types of hazardous materials. 
I spoke with Marissa Baker, a professor of occupational health and hygiene at the University of Washington: 
“The federal or state agencies would not have kind of purview on inspecting, maintaining the tank. 
Is it structurally sound? 
Is it being cleaned as it should? 
That's going to really fall on the employer.” 
While these tanks aren't tightly regulated, Baker makes the point that our state constitution does require every worker to have a safe workplace, and that was clearly not the case at Nippon Dynawave when multiple workers were killed on the job. 
Wouldn't people in communities like Port Townsend and Longview have the right to know what is being done to keep people and workers safe? 
Well, these mills are private businesses, and generally what they do is private information. 
But when you're dealing with large amounts of hazardous materials, federal law says the public does have a right to know what's going on there and what's being done to keep the community safe. 
Once a year, these mills are required to disclose how much hazardous material they have on-hand and how they store it, and they're supposed to make that information publicly available. 
You might think this would end up on a website somewhere that anybody could just search for and find, but that's not the case. 
You have to file a public records request to get this information. 
I did that with the counties and the state to get this information. 
This morning, Cowlitz County told me they found the records I requested, but they couldn't send them to me yet. 
They're giving the mills two weeks to seek a court order to prohibit disclosure of these records, and that's even though the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act says those reports must be available to the public. 
Again, the public does have a right to know. 
That Community Right-to-Know Act also requires the mills and local governments to have plans for what to do if they do have a hazardous material spill. 
The local emergency planning committees in the mill counties are having their first meetings since the Nippon Dynawave disaster coming up very soon. 
If people want to try to find out more in person, the emergency planning committee for Cowlitz and Wahkiakum counties is meeting tomorrow [Thursday] afternoon. 
For Port Townsend, in Jefferson County, there’s a meeting in July. 
Listen to the interview by clicking the play button above. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.1%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Kim Malcolm: 3.3%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 10.0%Kim Malcolm: 4.4%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Kim Malcolm: 5.2%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias3.3%This article: 4.9%Kim Malcolm: 1.3%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 26.9%Kim Malcolm: 5.4%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias26.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 3.5%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Kim Malcolm: 1.1%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 3.3%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.4%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority21.4%This article: 3.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.5%Kim Malcolm: 4.1%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.5%Kim Malcolm: 3.7%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.5%This article: 10.2%Kim Malcolm: 0.9%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question10.2%This article: 3.6%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.5%Kim Malcolm: 4.2%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.3%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.3%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.2%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading5.2%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.3%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.2%Kim Malcolm: 3.9%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice17.2%This article: 4.5%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination4.5%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.7%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

728 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers24%attributed speech555writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKim Malcolm • 26 words • 100.0% coverageKim Malcolm • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Ryan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Ryan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Ryan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Ryan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSmurfit Westrock mill • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNORPAC • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMarissa Baker • 16 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Baker • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarissa Baker • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMarissa Baker • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCowlitz County • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kim Malcolm

87%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words17% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%45.0%90.0%Biased Writer Voice+68.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%Kim Malcolm: 86.7%86.7%Indoctrination-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.