Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Paper Mills results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,417 keywords). This Paper Mills is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Paper Mills
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Paper Mills (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos