Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Chemical Safety results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 3,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,442 keywords). This Chemical Safety is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chemical Safety
Keyword details
Total words: 5,792
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst