Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lauren Dake results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Lauren Dake is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lauren Dake
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Lauren Dake (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos