Topic summary
⁠26%5 analyzed articles/videos4,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Policy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,502 hits. Analysis detected 12,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,548 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,398 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Policy is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Drug Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,548
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos