Author summary
86% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Burns results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,155 hits . Analysis detected 9,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,814 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,107 of 6,629 authors). This Ryan Burns is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Ryan Burns
Author details
Total words: 8,814
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst