Topic summary
54% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drone Warfare results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 3,248 hits . Analysis detected 30,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,560 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,517 of 15,492 topics). This Drone Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Drone Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 29,560
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles29.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst