BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 583 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,009 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the article peer group.

Ukrainian drones have struck an oil terminal in St. 
Petersburg as Kyiv ramps up bombardment of Russia’s oil infrastructure. 
Almost daily long-range attacks on Russian oil facilities have created a fuel crisis and heaped political pressure on the Kremlin as its all-out invasion of Ukraine stretches into its fifth year. 
Gov. 
Alexander Beglov said the city’s Kirovsky district on the Baltic Sea was hit. 
He also said that air defenses shot down 72 Ukrainian drones across Russia’s second-largest city and the surrounding region. 
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the attack as part of Ukraine’s “long-range sanctions” against Russia. 
He said that Ukrainian forces also hit a military target on the island of Kronstadt, just off the coast of St. 
Petersburg. 
“The Ukrainian defense forces hit the port oil infrastructure, which earns money for the Russian war, and there were also hits on Kronstadt  an important military target,” he said in a post on Telegram. 
Russian President Vladimir Putin has shrugged off Ukraine’s strikes on Russia’s energy facilities as “not critical,” and insisted the war will continue until his goals are met. 
He has described the attacks on Russian energy as an effort by Ukraine to distract attention from its losses on the battlefield, although analysts say the advance of Russian forces has been stymied in recent months. 
On Friday, Putin visited the Russian military headquarters directing the war in Ukraine and received a report on the capture of the city of Kostyantynivka, after weeks of intense street battles. 
He hailed it as a key step toward capturing the nearby cities of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, the key remaining strongholds in the so-called “forest belt” of heavily fortified cities in the Donetsk region that remain in Ukraine’s hands. 
“The city is now under our full control. 
Units of the Southern Army Group are completing the clearance of city blocks, rooting out small groups and individual Ukrainian fighters who may still be hiding in basements and ruins,” he said. 
Zelenskyy denied that Russia took control of the city. 
“It is just another Russian lie, an attempt to generate some kind of a news story,” he wrote on social media Saturday. 
“If Kostiantynivka were under Russian control, then perhaps Putin would have no problem meeting me there to find a diplomatic way to finally end this war. 
But the fact is, he won’t cross the front line  reality is very different from Putin’s words.” 
But the Kremlin quickly dismissed Zelenskyy’s offer, with Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov telling Radio Komsomolskaya Pravda on Saturday evening that Putin would meet the Ukrainian leader in Moscow once Kyiv was ready to make “important, consequential decisions.” 
Putin appears to believe his government can keep the fuel crisis from eroding his authority and support for the war he launched more than four years ago. 
At the very least, the attacks have brought the war home even more poignantly for millions of Russians, shattering Putin’s narrative of the conflict as something that doesn’t affect the lives of ordinary people in his country. 
The border city of Belgorod, which Ukrainian drone strikes have also repeatedly targeted, was left almost completely without power on Saturday due to overnight attacks, local media reported. 
Meanwhile, eight people were wounded after a Russian attack struck residential buildings in Ukraine’s southeastern region of Zaporizhzhia, including two children, local authorities said on Saturday. 
___ 
Follow the AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.3%The Associated Press: 2.7%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%The Associated Press: 3.2%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.7%The Associated Press: 11.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect23.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%The Associated Press: 3.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 10.1%The Associated Press: 1.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias10.1%This article: 24.7%The Associated Press: 10.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias24.7%This article: 12.2%The Associated Press: 2.2%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias12.2%This article: 10.8%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error10.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%The Associated Press: 2.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%The Associated Press: 2.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem3.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.7%The Associated Press: 3.8%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority11.7%This article: 9.1%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma9.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.7%The Associated Press: 3.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization11.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.0%The Associated Press: 5.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion11.0%This article: 12.5%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question12.5%This article: 13.2%The Associated Press: 2.9%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 21.6%The Associated Press: 1.7%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)21.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 38.4%The Associated Press: 1.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote38.4%This article: 6.3%The Associated Press: 1.2%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.3%This article: 11.0%The Associated Press: 3.9%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice11.0%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination3.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%The Associated Press: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

583 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers61%attributed speech226writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAlexander Beglov • 13 words • 100.0% coverageAlexander Beglov • 19 words • 100.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 15 words • 100.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 35 words • 100.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 27 words • 100.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 38 words • 0.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 8 words • 100.0% coverageVladimir Putin • 32 words • 0.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 9 words • 0.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 22 words • 100.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 26 words • 0.0% coverageVolodymyr Zelenskyy • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDmitry Peskov • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dmitry Peskov

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words11% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+76.1 ptsWriter: 23.9%Dmitry Peskov: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Dmitry Peskov: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.9 ptsWriter: 4.9%Dmitry Peskov: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.