Topic summary
72% 9 analyzed articles/videos 10,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disaster Recovery results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 5,022 hits . Analysis detected 34,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,161 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,882 of 15,711 topics). This Disaster Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Disaster Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 36,161
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles36.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst