Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard H. Weiss results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 4,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,090 of 6,361 authors). This Richard H. Weiss is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Richard H. Weiss
Author details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.9% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.6% 19.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.3% 30.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst