Topic summary
46% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disaster Management results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 2,153 hits . Analysis detected 14,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,281 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,719 of 15,781 topics). This Disaster Management is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Disaster Management
Topic details
Total words: 15,281
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.1% 14.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst