Topic summary
35% 7 analyzed articles/videos 808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disaster Aid results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,848 hits . Analysis detected 17,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,808 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,355 of 15,447 topics). This Disaster Aid is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Disaster Aid
Topic details
Total words: 25,808
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst