Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bozeman Daily Chronicle results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Bozeman Daily Chronicle is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,060
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst