Topic summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos2,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diet And Nutrition results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,500 hits. Analysis detected 6,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,412 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,985 of 15,753 topics). This Diet And Nutrition is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Diet And Nutrition
Topic details
Total words: 8,412
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos