Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Socialists results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 5,242 hits. Analysis detected 32,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,722 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,055 of 16,562 topics). This Democratic Socialists is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Democratic Socialists
Topic details
Total words: 15,722
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos