Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milli Sands results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 891 hits. Analysis detected 7,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,184 of 6,628 authors). This Milli Sands is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Milli Sands
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
83%Milli Sands (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 13.0%13.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 14.1%14.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Author 13.1%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos