Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milli Sands results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Ad Hominem , and Straw Man , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 891 hits . Analysis detected 7,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,184 of 6,628 authors). This Milli Sands is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Milli Sands
Author details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.3% 22.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 13.0% 13.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 14.1% 14.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 13.2%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 13.1%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst