Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linda R. Killian results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.2% saturation with 2,457 hits . Analysis detected 12,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (574 of 6,628 authors). This Linda R. Killian is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Linda R. Killian
Author details
Total words: 4,012
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.4% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 61.2% 61.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 40.5% 40.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 21.2% 21.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.6% 21.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.4% 17.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 61.2%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 40.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Author 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst