Topic summary
ā 47% 18 analyzed articles/videos 9,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Spending results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 6,633 hits . Analysis detected 52,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,904 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ā 15% (13,442 of 15,701 topics). This Defense Spending is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Defense Spending
Topic details
Total words: 56,904
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score18 analyzed articles56.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst