Topic summary
10% 22 analyzed articles/videos 8,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Death results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 3,138 hits . Analysis detected 32,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,102 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 1% (15,053 of 15,142 topics). This Death is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Death
Topic details
Total words: 66,102
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 1.0% BS Score22 analyzed articles66.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst