Married dad likely pushed to death down 30-foot shaft during fight with co-worker: cops 78%

By Chris Bradford73%

7/15/2026, 12:56:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 598 faulty-reasoning hits from 135 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.9% and a BS Rank of 78% (5,017 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the article peer group.

A Texas construction worker plummeted 30 feet to his death down a shaft -- with cops suspecting he may have been pushed while fighting wth a co-worker. 
Married father of three Lorenzo Gonzalez, 46, died at a site in Sheldon, east of Houston, at 7:45 a.m. 
Monday, KRIV reported. 
Gonzalez “was in a physical altercation with a co-worker when he fell 30 feet into an underground well station,” Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez said, saying it was “possible [he] was pushed.” 
However, no arrests have been made as the investigation continues, cops said. 
“He was one of the hardest-working people we knew and always put his family first, working tirelessly to provide for them,” his loved ones said in a fundraiser. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.0%Chris Bradford: 4.1%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias20.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 2.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.0%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.5%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.1%Chris Bradford: 10.7%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect34.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.9%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.7%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias20.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.4%Chris Bradford: 16.2%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias30.4%This article: 20.7%Chris Bradford: 2.2%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias20.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.9%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.5%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 34.8%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect34.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.3%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.7%Chris Bradford: 4.4%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority23.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.6%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.0%Chris Bradford: 4.9%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization20.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 45.2%Chris Bradford: 11.5%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion45.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 23.7%Chris Bradford: 0.9%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof23.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 20.7%Chris Bradford: 3.8%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal20.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 30.4%Chris Bradford: 1.6%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)30.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.2%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.7%Chris Bradford: 4.8%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote23.7%This article: 20.0%Chris Bradford: 3.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection20.0%This article: 24.4%Chris Bradford: 11.6%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice24.4%This article: 20.7%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination20.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.5%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.7%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.7%

135 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers26%attributed speech100writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageKRIV • 3 words • 0.0% coverageEd Gonzalez • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ed Gonzalez

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words91% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ed Gonzalez: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-33.0 ptsWriter: 33.0%Ed Gonzalez: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-28.0 ptsWriter: 28.0%Ed Gonzalez: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -28.0 ptsWriter: 28.0%Ed Gonzalez: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-27.0 ptsWriter: 27.0%Ed Gonzalez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.