Topic summary
28%5 analyzed articles/videos272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Accident results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,259 hits. Analysis detected 5,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,168 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,863 of 15,555 topics). This Accident is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Accident
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate