Topic summary
72% 6 analyzed articles/videos 9,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 4,768 hits . Analysis detected 30,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,775 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,559 of 15,447 topics). This Dating is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Dating
Topic details
Total words: 29,775
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles29.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst