Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Speller results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,525 hits . Analysis detected 7,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (1,939 of 6,348 authors). This Katherine Speller is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Katherine Speller
Author details
Total words: 6,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.1% 25.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst