Topic summary
⁠64%5 analyzed articles/videos3,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Center results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,170 hits. Analysis detected 12,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,255 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,193 of 16,562 topics). This Data Center is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Data Center
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos