Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Calek results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 907 hits . Analysis detected 4,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (316 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Calek is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Andrew Calek
Author details
Total words: 2,127
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.2% percentile 10.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 39.4% 39.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 19.9% 19.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 42.6% 42.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 17.1% 17.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.6% 13.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 42.6%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 39.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.3%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst