Topic summary
80% 8 analyzed articles/videos 18,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counterterrorism results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 6,429 hits . Analysis detected 60,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,085 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (12,571 of 15,142 topics). This Counterterrorism is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Counterterrorism
Topic details
Total words: 62,085
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles62.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst