Topic summary
33% 21 analyzed articles/videos 10,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cost Of Living results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 4,601 hits . Analysis detected 59,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 81,850 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (14,699 of 15,399 topics). This Cost Of Living is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Cost Of Living
Topic details
Total words: 81,850
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score21 analyzed articles81.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst