Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michelle Bellefontaine results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Michelle Bellefontaine is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michelle Bellefontaine
Author details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst