I moved from Texas to California  here's what I learned about housing 20%

By Jeff Burton0%

6/24/2026, 4:40:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 550 faulty-reasoning hits from 603 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,553 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the article peer group.

America is running a real-time experiment in politics and prosperity, and California and Texas are the laboratories. 
As one of the few people who actually moved from Texas to California, I’ve had a front-row seat to both. 
We won’t know for another decade which model ultimately produces better results, but we can compare the facts and numbers today. 
People vote at the ballot box every two years. 
They vote with their feet every day. 
For the average Joe, Texas is also becoming more appealing than California. 
The California Dream used to be that the Golden State was affordable for all. 
But now, too many families are moving because that dream is unattainable. 
Homeownership is becoming impossible for many middle-income Californians. 
When a teacher, police officer, nurse or firefighter can’t afford to buy a home in the communities they serve, that’s not a housing problem. 
That’s a governing problem. 
California does not have a revenue problem. 
It has a results problem. 
The state excels at creating wealth. 
It struggles to make that wealth affordable for the people who live there. 
California builds world-changing companies. 
Texas makes it easier to build a life. 
There’s no doubt that California is an economic powerhouse and still sets the pace for innovation globally. 
The state employs over 1.5 million tech workers and leads the US high-tech sector with approximately $542.5 billion in direct economic output a year. 
California has unmatched innovation and talent in AI, biotech, quantum hardware and other advancing technologies. 
However, California’s government has yet to figure out how to keep its competitive edge without regulating itself into stagnation. 
Regulations such as AI-in-hiring mandates, expanding employment requirements and California’s aggressive labor litigation framework are making it harder and more expensive to operate a business. 
Under laws like PAGA, even minor payroll or administrative errors can escalate into costly lawsuits, creating significant risk for employers of all sizes. 
Texas starts from a different place. 
Housing is more attainable. 
Taxes are lower. 
Regulation is lighter in key sectors. 
We’ve seen major companies such as Tesla, X, Oracle and others move away from California and put down roots in the Lone Star State’s biggest cities. 
Top CEOs and executives are seeing the endless possibilities that Texas can offer them. 
When deciding where to expand, many of America’s largest companies are choosing Texas over California. 
Rapid growth creates its own problems. 
Schools, roads and infrastructure all get stretched. 
But the starting point is different, and that shapes everything that follows. 
Texas continues to attract people and investment, but now has to manage the pressures that come with them, including infrastructure demands, grid reliability concerns and rapid urban, suburban and exurban growth. 
Politically, California Democrats are increasingly having an internal argument. 
After years of one-party control, the debate is no longer just between Democrats and Republicans, but within the Democratic party itself. 
The question is no longer whether California is progressive. 
The question is whether progressive policies are producing results. 
Texas is more politically stable. 
Growth is reshaping its politics, but the governing philosophy is consistent enough to keep its economic message intact. 
Over time, people will make the judgment that matters most; not in commentary or politics, but in where they choose to live, work and raise a family. 
California remains one of the greatest, most innovative and beautiful places on earth. 
The problem is that it’s becoming harder and harder to afford. 
For now, the California Dream isn’t dying. 
It’s house-hunting in Texas. 
Jeff Burton is a political strategist and co-founding partner of Maven Advocacy Partners. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.4%Jeff Burton: 5.2%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Jeff Burton: 3.4%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Jeff Burton: 1.7%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias3.5%This article: 20.6%Jeff Burton: 11.3%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect20.6%This article: 2.0%Jeff Burton: 1.0%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.7%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Jeff Burton: 2.8%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias1.8%This article: 3.3%Jeff Burton: 1.7%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Jeff Burton: 1.7%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.7%Jeff Burton: 1.9%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.7%This article: 3.2%Jeff Burton: 1.6%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.1%Jeff Burton: 10.5%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization21.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeff Burton: 1.7%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Jeff Burton: 10.2%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Burton: 0.0%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

603 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.