Topic summary
35% 15 analyzed articles/videos 7,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contempt Of Congress results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 2,546 hits . Analysis detected 17,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,778 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (22,552 of 23,273 topics). This Contempt Of Congress is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Contempt Of Congress
Topic details
Total words: 38,778
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 0.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles38.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst