RedState95%

Hilarious: Fauci's Wife Was So Furious About the Contempt Vote, She Let Rip With an Obscene Gesture 89%

By Teri Christoph94%

8/6/2026, 2:08:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 497 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,372 of 28,902 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the article peer group.

Thursday was not a good day for the Fauci family, and it looks like the stress of it all might be catching up with them. 
Hours after the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, led by Sen. 
Rand Paul (R-KY), voted to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress, the diminutive doctor was seen outside his home sporting the sourest of faces as he moved recycling bins around his property in Washington, D.C. 
He did not look at all happy, but his wife was the one who really let her emotions get the best of her. 
After getting the recycling all squared away, Fauci hopped into the passenger seat of the family car, and his wife, Christine Grady, took the wheel. 
She seemed to notice a photographer nearby as they drove out of their property and, much like her husband, she was not best pleased, flipping the photographer the bird as she peeled out of the driveway. 
Maybe Grady was trying to turn her husband's frown upside down, but it looked more like they both were seething at the idea that the disgraced doctor might actually be held responsible for his actions during COVID. 
As RedState reported earlier Thursday, Fauci was found to be in contempt of Congress after a party line vote by the very same Senate committee in front of which he pleaded the Fifth over 100 times. 
The contempt charge now goes to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for consideration, and he could face some jail time if the case moves forward. 
No wonder Grady was so touchy. 
The thought of her husband being cuffed and stuffed was clearly too much for her. 
Lest you feel too sorry for Christine Grady, though, just remember that she, too, was a COVID scold. 
Here she is telling nurses they'd better get the clot shot or they'd face losing their jobs. 
The tyrant gene is strong in this family, isn't it? 
The Faucis spent years demanding that ordinary Americans blindly follow their mandates ... or else. 
Now that accountability has come knocking at their own front door  and is attached to the grinning face of Rand Paul  they apparently can’t handle their emotions. 
So, while we may not be seeing Dr. 
Fauci sporting an orange prison jumpsuit  yet  there is some satisfaction in knowing how downright miserable the thought of being held accountable is to the pair. 
At long last, it's the Faucis who must now sit down, shut up, and wait for the consequences to be dealt them. 
Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical Left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve. 
Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.9%Teri Christoph: 5.6%RedState: 6.4%Confirmation Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.1%RedState: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 2.7%RedState: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.2%RedState: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 14.7%Teri Christoph: 0.6%RedState: 0.8%Hindsight Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 1.1%RedState: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 8.9%RedState: 8.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Teri Christoph: 0.3%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.6%RedState: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 1.1%RedState: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Teri Christoph: 1.8%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 46.1%Teri Christoph: 14.7%RedState: 13.1%Negativity Bias46.1%This article: 2.8%Teri Christoph: 1.9%RedState: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 20.3%Teri Christoph: 4.0%RedState: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error20.3%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.5%RedState: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 7.1%RedState: 4.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Teri Christoph: 3.4%RedState: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 1.0%RedState: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.6%RedState: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.8%RedState: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.3%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Teri Christoph: 8.5%RedState: 6.1%Ad Hominem8.9%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 3.2%RedState: 2.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 1.6%RedState: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.8%Teri Christoph: 1.3%RedState: 2.1%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.5%RedState: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Teri Christoph: 7.0%RedState: 9.1%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.1%RedState: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.6%RedState: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 24.1%Teri Christoph: 10.1%RedState: 7.7%Appeal to Emotion24.1%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 2.1%RedState: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.5%Teri Christoph: 1.0%RedState: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.5%This article: 3.6%Teri Christoph: 0.1%RedState: 0.7%Tu Quoque3.6%This article: 4.4%Teri Christoph: 0.8%RedState: 1.1%Burden of Proof4.4%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.5%RedState: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.5%Teri Christoph: 2.0%RedState: 2.5%Anecdotal19.5%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.4%Teri Christoph: 0.9%RedState: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.4%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.0%Teri Christoph: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy2.0%This article: 10.7%Teri Christoph: 3.0%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote10.7%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 1.4%RedState: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 41.6%Teri Christoph: 22.6%RedState: 19.4%Biased Writer Voice41.6%This article: 11.9%Teri Christoph: 5.0%RedState: 4.4%Indoctrination11.9%This article: 0.0%Teri Christoph: 0.5%RedState: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Teri Christoph: 14.3%RedState: 14.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.7%This article: 11.3%Teri Christoph: 5.2%RedState: 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.3%

497 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers28%attributed speech358writer words
Selected voice

Christine Grady

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words26% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+52.2 ptsWriter: 47.8%Christine Grady: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-8.7 ptsWriter: 8.7%Christine Grady: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Christine Grady: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Christine Grady: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Christine Grady: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.