Topic summary
60% 10 analyzed articles/videos 9,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Policy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 3,817 hits . Analysis detected 31,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,817 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,734 of 16,562 topics). This Health Policy is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Health Policy
Topic details
Total words: 33,817
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
MS NOW 95% 12/23/2025, 4:07:29 PM