Keyword summary
93% 4 analyzed articles/videos 823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Fauci results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 2,828 hits . Analysis detected 16,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,170 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,612 of 37,536 keywords). This Anthony Fauci is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Anthony Fauci
Keyword details
Total words: 10,170
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst