Topic summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compounding Pharmacies results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 8,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,945 of 16,562 topics). This Compounding Pharmacies is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Compounding Pharmacies
Topic details
Total words: 6,140
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos