Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerome Adams results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 3,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,607 of 6,528 authors). This Jerome Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Jerome Adams
Author details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Middle Ground: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst