Author summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Feinberg results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 673 hits . Analysis detected 5,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,594 of 6,359 authors). This Eric Feinberg is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Eric Feinberg
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.8% 19.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 19.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst