Topic summary
66%25 analyzed articles/videos26,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commentary results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 25,158 hits. Analysis detected 168,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 139,453 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,630 of 15,364 topics). This Commentary is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score25 analyzed articles139.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate