Author summary
42%2 analyzed articles/videos5,636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mara Karlin results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,838 hits. Analysis detected 15,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,321 of 6,382 authors). This Mara Karlin is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Mara Karlin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Mara Karlin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,544
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos