Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cognitive Decline results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 749 hits. Analysis detected 4,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,952 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,317 of 16,562 topics). This Cognitive Decline is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Cognitive Decline
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos