Topic summary
⁠35%3 analyzed articles/videos2,699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cocktails results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 976 hits. Analysis detected 9,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,660 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,703 of 16,562 topics). This Cocktails is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Cocktails
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,660
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos