Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Shwe results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 615 hits. Analysis detected 6,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,724 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,948 of 6,215 authors). This Elizabeth Shwe is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Shwe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Elizabeth Shwe (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,724
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos