Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Weissmann results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 798 hits . Analysis detected 7,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,589 of 6,244 authors). This Jordan Weissmann is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Jordan Weissmann
Author details
Total words: 9,148
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst